West Ham 1-2 Bolton | Premier League match report

Before the game, one of the televisions in the press room was unplugged because Bolton’s team of match analysts needed the scart lead. It was an easy enough problem to fix. West Ham had a collective screw loose, and that proved somewhat more problematic.

This was always supposed to be a one-sided game, but the surprising thing was the identity of the one side. West Ham had kept four successive clean sheets at home in the league, while Bolton had not scored in their last five away, but the visitors were, in their own way, magnificent. On this evidence, Owen Coyle has not transformed their playing style, rather he seems to have supercharged it. We all know what Bolton do well, but they did it better. Much, much better.

West Ham were two down at half-time, and it could have been four or more. The goals came in the opening 16 minutes, from attacks down the right wing. Both were embarrassingly easy, the second particularly so.

In the 10th minute, Fabrice Muamba challenged Alessandro Diamanti in the centre circle, winning the ball. The Italian fell to the ground, clutching his leg, as play continued via Gretar Steinsson to Lee Chung-Yong. The Korean’s cross from the right curled back towards goal and landed on the head of the onrushing Kevin Davies, six yards out. Diamanti was barely back on his feet by the time the ball hit the back of the net.

Six minutes later, Steinsson chipped the ball down the inside-right channel, James Tomkins attempted to usher it out of play and Davies stole in to poke the ball towards the centre. Had the attack ended there it would have been embarrassing enough. It did not. To their credit, Bolton had two men in the box, gambling on Davies winning the ball. One of them, Tamir Cohen, headed the ball down and the other, Jack Wilshere, volleyed into the net.

It was a humiliating goal to concede, but there could have been more: Johan Elmander was allowed a free header from a long throw, and missed an easy chance in first-half stoppage time. From a Lee cross, Wilshere had a free header; if he had been any taller than 5ft 8in he would surely have scored. All of this before half-time.

Bolton could not keep up that level of intensity, and once Cohen was given a second yellow card with 20 minutes to play, their task became one of containment. West Ham threw on attacking players, but still they could not attack with conviction. With less than two minutes to go, Diamanti picked up a loose ball on the right wing, cut inside and shot inside the far post. He celebrated almost apologetically, as well he might. After a recent improvement, the shadow of relegation hangs over his side once again.

West Ham UnitedBolton WanderersPremier LeagueSimon Burntonguardian.co.uk

Future of Olympic Stadium must be settled by end of the year

• Baroness Ford urges West Ham to make their intentions clear
• No reason why athletics and football cannot co-exist, she says

Wrangles over who gets to use the Olympic Stadium after the London 2012 Games must finish by the end of this year, the Olympic legacy chief Baroness Ford said today.

Considering West Ham United’s new and high-profile interest in moving in to the east London stadium after the Games amid other suggested would-be tenants, a public consultation process will be used to help make the decision, she told MPs.

Baroness Ford, chair of the Olympic Park Legacy Company (OPLC), which is in charge of planning, developing and managing the Olympic Park, said: “It seems the time is absolutely right now to go into a public process to get a set of settled uses for the stadium.

“This is a £540 million public asset so it goes without saying that we are not just going to have some conversation off stage left and someone is going to take over the stadium.

“It has to be a publicly managed process to demonstrate value for money and that we are keeping the bid commitments that were there.”

It will start with three months of market testing, including publication of an OPLC prospectus in the next few weeks inviting people to make suggestions on what they can do in legacy. A formal procurement process will then take place.

Baroness Ford told the Culture, Media and Sport Committee: “We are really hoping we will get to an agreed position by the end of the year so we can say ‘here are the uses for the stadium’ and we can put that to one side and get on with other things.

“I am quite confident that we can get to a good decision on the stadium but we must do it this year because it can not be left to just drag on.”

Rumours have been rife that rugby and Twenty20 cricket could also be interested in using the stadium but Baroness Ford insisted that the bid pledge of having a grand prix athletics track after the Games “have to be met”.

She said: “We know that the amount of times that athletics will be used in the stadium will not be a huge amount of times, maybe a couple of dozen times a year, but for me premier athletics must be part of the mix because that was part of the bid commitment.”

West Ham’s new co-owners David Gold and David Sullivan took over the cash-strapped club this year and immediately confirmed their interest in relocating to the 80,000-capacity Olympic Stadium in Stratford, east London, as they try to improve the club finances.

The stadium is to be shrunk into a 25,000-seater venue after the Games complete with an athletics track. At the moment, there seems no reason why football and athletics could not exist together in the stadium, Baroness Ford pointed out.

She said: “Technically the pitch within the track is absolutely Fifa-compliant, from the point of view of size and sight lines, and evidently the stadium is IAAF-compliant.

“These things could technically co-exist, it is whether people would want to co-exist.

“Ed Warner [the UK Athletics chief executive] I know is quite happy to share with football and it is now for football to tell us, if they want to come in to the stadium, how they would want to keep their part of the bargain in terms of the bid.”

Baroness Ford said West Ham are not “the only show in town” in terms of use of the stadium as the OPLC is in “lots of discussions with many other people”.

She noted: “We need to get this settled once and for all this year. “The current planning status quo is for the stadium to be taken down and rebuilt into a 25,000- seater, the new Crystal Palace, and if that is what we decide to do, fine. We should not apologise for that. We have Twickenham, we have Wembley, and we would have a new athletics stadium – that is what is currently envisaged.

“If alongside that or complementary to that other things can happen in the stadium that make it more viable, more animated, give loads of access, that involve the community – that would be absolutely fantastic.”

Olympic games 2012West Ham UnitedAthleticsguardian.co.uk

Should West Ham get use of the Olympic stadium?

Should a football team be allowed to move into a stadium that was supposed to have an athletics legacy